|
GENERAL
"Tyler
Anbinder Discusses the Historical Accuracy of Martin Scorsese's
New Film 'Gangs of New York,'" History
News Network, December 23, 2002 (NPR interview).
Maureen Dezell, "Film Captures
the Feeling But Not the Facts of Life in Five Points," Boston
Globe, December 20, 2002.
Vincent DiGirolamo"
Such,
Such Were the B'hoys" Radical History Review (90)
2004.
Pete Hamill, "Trampling
City's History: 'Gangs' Misses Point of Five Points,"
New York Daily News, December 14, 2002.
David Hinckley, "New
York's Nastiest," New York Daily News, December
8, 2002.
Robert W. Snyder, "Gangs
of New York Gets New York City Wrong," openDemocracy,
January 15, 2003.
DRAFT RIOTS
"History
Lesson: Author and Civil War-era Expert Iver Bernstein on
the Inaccuracies in Martin Scorsese’s ‘Gangs of New York,’"
Newsweek.Com, January 10, 2003.
Wil Haygood, "The
Battle of Old New York: Scorsese Movie Sheds Light on a
Dark Period in U.S. History," Washington Post,
January 4, 2003.
GANGS
Joshua Brown,
"The Bloody Sixth: The Real Gangs of New York," London
Review of Books, 25:2 January 23, 2002.
Dan Vergano, "The 'Gangs' All Here on a New York Tour," USA
Today, December 3, 2002.
WHAT
HISTORIANS HAVE TO SAY
From Ken Jackson,
Jacques Barzun Professor of History and the Social Sciences,
Columbia University; Editor, The Encyclopedia of New
York City:
"On Gangs of New York,
I spoke with Professor Eric Monkonnen of UCLA, the expert
of violence in NYC in history, and he said that in the entire
year of 1846, there were only ten homicides in New York.
In the gang fight at the beginning of the movie, there seemed
to be dozens of dead bodies on the field of combat."
|